Throughout the World club football history, there was a chronological evolutionary change of
competitions. The first professional football was formed in England
1892 while the amateur football was first ever established in South Americas a year later in Argentina but most of European and South American leagues turned professional in the 1930s. The limitations of football at the early era such as non-existence of
international club competition, the irregularity of competition format and
qualification, etc has left the complexity and difficulty for us to reach
the status of each European club in its whole history.
The world club team all-time ranking[1]and The Worldwide historical club ranking[2] based on mathematics [Marcelo, 2016) ranks the team based on titles criteria which is set the standard points of title acquisition between the leagues and the point given to any league are equally given between seasons. By this context, there is no proven source of standard point and not represents the actual fluctuation of the league/international cup standard from era to era. The evaluations were also not differentiated the performances to achieve the round or title.
Accordingly, this work’s objective is to study, integrally regulate and standardize the system of the entire Latin American club history for the evaluation, including all performance characteristics (win-draw-lose, goal difference, place, round and trophy) against the determined standard of competitions within the designed system of methodology conformed to the existed format or condition at any point of evaluation.
II. Methodology
1) International Club
1.1) Determine the winner of each annual continental competition by qualitative analysis. For the non-int-club era, the official friendly results are support to stipulate the value, if no enough record, performance of its national team are applied for consideration.
1.2) Determine the competitive level by counting goal difference to calculate its average for each round and input by the following formula ;
(∑ Goal Difference Average/(Number of Round x 4.5))
(Number of Round +((6-Number of round)/2))/6
The standard of competition (STD) = Top Level X Competitive Level
1.3) The Status Performance (STS) = SQRT(TLS- (FTC – 1) x GS x STD
Finished Round Coefficient (FRC) (Winner = 1, Runner-Up = 2, SF = 3, QF = 4, R16 = 5, R32 = 6, R64 = 7, R128 = 8)
GS = Gap Standard = 0.65+(6- number of round)*0.05
TLS = Top Level Standard (UCL/EC =5, UC = 4.5, CWC/ERP = 3.7)
1.4) The Raw Direct Performance (RDRT) is calculated by chain of beaten from top level to the evaluated team. Being beaten 1 goal is equal to – 0.4. For group round format, the difference will be calculated based on following formula ; ∑ ((DGD/N)*0.4)/Nq i
DGD : The descending goal difference
N : The number of matches
Nq : The number of qualified teams in the group
Then, the performance will be adjusted +0.75 and x 0.85 to give positive value for negative raw data.
1.5) The total performance = SQRT(STS X ADRT)
2) Domestic League
2.1) Determine the raw direct performance (RDRT) by point and goal difference
Point Ratio = ((Games win x 2.5) +(Games Draw x 1))/Number of Games
Goal Difference Ratio = Goal Difference/Number of Games
RDRT = (Point Ratio x 0.75) +(Goal Difference Ratio x 0.25)
2.2) Determine top level
2.21) Top Tier League : Referring to the best performance in international club (TEU) against the competitive level by the formula : PSTD (Primary Standard) = (TEU x (2 – Variance)/2)
2.22) The Second League : Implementing benchmark method by calculating the average place of the promoted teams between the previous season to the calculated season and to the next seasons. The obtained calculated finished place is applied to the table in the calculated season linked to its raw direct performance that is a top level. The decimal > 0.15 and < 0.85 of the finished place value is required to calculate for average value between places. The obtained value is acted as TRDP in clause 2.23
2.23) The Top Level Raw Direct performance (TRDP) is adjusted by + 0.75 x 1.5 to give positive value for negative raw data to be the top level adjusted direct performance (TADP)
2.24) The top level performance (TLV) is the direct performance against primary standard
TLV = TEU+((Y-(((-X2)/8)+(X/8)+5))/2) ; Y = TADP, X = PSTD
2.3) Standard of League (STDL)
STDL = Top Level Performance x Competitive Level
Competitive Level = (2-Sc)/2
S1= Variance = ∑ (x1-µ)2/number of members ;
x1 = point ratio (win = 2.5 point, draw 1 point)
S2= Variance = ∑ (x2-µ)2/number of members ;
x2 = goal difference (Separate positive and negative µ value)
Sc (Combined Varaince) = S1 (0.75) + S2 (0.25)
2.4) Final Calculation
Final Direct Performance (FDP) = (RDRT+0.75 x 1.5) x (TLV/TADP)
Status Performance (STS) = SQRT[(5-(FP -1)*0.1) x STDL]for Top Flight
SQRT[5-(N1-1)*0.1] x STDL1 - [SQRT[(5-(FP -1)*0.1) x STDL2] for 2nd Tier
N1 = Number of team in top fllight
League Performance = SQRT[FDP x STS]
3) Domestic Cup
Implement the same method as International club and the top level is determined from international club as well as the league competition. For tournament championship such as German Championship in pre-bundesliga era, it is implemented in the same concept as performance in knock-out tournament is used for identifying value of top level team.
4) Final Calculation
Basic Proportional Weight : Domestic League 52 %, Domestic Cup 16 %, Int. Club 32 % The performance is calculated in aggregate within a season not separated since the performance between competitions were a mutual dependent factors as football is purpose to mainly win the trophy not optimize the performance in any of competition level. As many of competitions are tournaments formats, it is implemented and calculated in aggregate mini-leagues method. For the season without domestic cup, basically the domestic league proportion is expanded to 60 % and increase more 16 % in non-international club era. Exceptionally the league proportion could be increased between 77 at minimum and 80 % at maximum by compensation from over number of participation (> 38 to 46 games per seasons). However, if the obtained performance is a negative value, it is not applied to the system and equal to Zero. That mean the lowest value to apply for the system has been standardized.
To standardize the opportunity of international club participation. The standard value of league performance at 3.25 has been set. The clubs that achieved this value but not get the opportunity because its league is competitive, will be compensated the higher proportion for domestic competition by 50 %. In contrary, the clubs that got the opportunity to play in international club with less than 3.25 of league performance in the previous season will be deducted the entire seasonal int. club points that is less than 2.5 in the over-participated number
The obtained seasonal performance will be matched to multiply with proportional weight of the best 92 seasons whose number is an average of available league seasons for the 50 qualified teams and calculated the sum to obtain aggregate total.
The trophy bonus is designed in the following table.
The league trophy bonus is given for only the club achieved the highest league point among national leagues in each season. The winners in the periods of 1927 - 1932 (pre-professional era) and 1940 - 1946 (war-time) are given bonus in less value than normal period. The domestic cup is not applied as a single bonus as the continental international cup has represented the teams in elimination format. However, it is applied for double and triple trophies if the club won International competitions and also won domestic cup. The International bonus is applied only to the winners of Intercontinental Cup/World Club Cup in its existed years. For the year without World competition, the winner of Europe and Latin American share the bonus by half of each.
5) The Decisive Factors
0.2 % is required as a minimum value to unanimously decide the rank. If not, consider if the comparison couple has the other seasons than average, if so, compare its other best season by one. 0.1 is a minimum value to beat, if not, consider another season until match the rule. In case of no other season, the peak season is a decisive value with a minimum 0.1 to significantly differentiate. If not, recomparing in the second peak season or more if necessary.
III. Implementation
The best 50 clubs from European and South American lists are rearranged. Previously, 103 European and 51 Latin American clubs are selected for implementation by considering number of available seasons and the entire finished places. The implementation was done by excel formula database by manual input and correction checking. All related Latin American seasonal league tables are calculated for the club performance and standard of competition. All related cup competition games are count for the goal difference to determine competitive level. Finally, all performance and standards result are input the conclusive table. Each club are input the performance data in each part of competition and calculate for the aggregate seasonal point by competition-level proportional weight conformed to the actual condition at the time.
The unavailable record : Paraguayan League (1906 – 1991). The Paraguayan clubs are ranked by international performance comparison against the estimative opportune factor of participation. Czechoslovakian Cup 1960 – 1970, Czech and Slovak Cup 1971 – 1980 ; Hungarian Cup 1934, 1935, 1941 – 1944, 1952, 1955, 1958, 1965 – 1968. For these related years, the competitive level is set by estimation. Ferencvaroc rating is effected little as there are the club result record. In the case of record unavailability, the case is equal to the unavailable competition that allows a higher portion of domestic league.
